my free cam cam

Judgment affirmed as a well timed-filed transcript of the trial and related proceedings, or written statement of info in lieu of a transcript, is essential to permit a overview of the merits of appellants assignments of error, Rule 5A:8(b)(4)(ii) 0832224 John E. Williams and Law Office of John E. Williams, Esq v. Larry J. Austin, et al. Benjamin J. Trichilo, Esq. Results are grouped by sort of source (e.g., books, newspapers, archives); within most teams, records appear in ascending chronological order and cannot be in any other case sorted; information might be marked for printing, e-mailing, downloading, or saving to an archive. Judgment affirmed where claimants medical records and testimony provide credible proof that she was totally disabled from June four by June 9, 2021; credible proof in the file helps the Commissions factual findings of causation; the Commission applied the proper limitation interval, Code § 65.2-708(A) 0324223 Askari Danso M.S. Commission didn’t err in finding that appellee provided a prima facie case that the medical payments at problem reflected the prevailing community fee or in concluding appellants response on this subject was unreasonable and awarding appellee a set amount of attorneys charges 1190204 Alfreda Ligon v. CPS II, Inc. and Employers Preferred Ins.

Trial court docket reached the correct result in declining to situation a deferred disposition beneath Starrs v. Commonwealth, 287 Va. Trial courtroom did not err in denying the motion to suppress where the firearms discovery was not the results of any police seizure or attempted pat down however because of his flight from the police and his fall; evidence was enough to prove appellant, a violent felon, possessed the firearm 1170211 Kaden Bockelman v. Millers Landscaping Sprinkler and Builders Mutual Ins. Judgment affirmed as a result of argument as to whether appellants responsible pleas were entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily is barred by Rule 5A:18 and no manifest injustice will consequence by applying that rule; no abuse of discretion as to courts sentencing because it obtained and considered his mitigating evidence 1432224 Board of Supervisors of Rappahannock County v. Joseph B. Long, et al. Judgment affirmed as failure to follow the sentencing pointers “shall not be reviewable on appeal . Trial court docket didn’t abuse its discretion when it sentenced appellant within the sentencing guidelines, which was consistent along with her request after failing to supply a urine pattern 1216224 Windset Capital Corporation v. Thomas Debosky, et al. Trial court docket didn’t err in failing to categorise, value, and distribute the marital property the place appellant did not adduce sufficient evidence for the trial court docket to perform these features 0449203 Penske Trucking Company L/P Epes Carriers & Hartford Underwriters Ins.

Trial court docket did not err in convicting appellant of two counts of violating a protective order beneath Code § 16.1-253.2 because the evidence was ample to prove that appellant knew the protective order existed and he despatched audio and textual content messages to the sufferer in violation of the order 0698222 Sandeep Yadav, et al. Judgment affirmed as there is no such thing as a jurisdiction to consider appellants first two assignments of error as a result of he did not file a well timed notice of appeal challenging the ultimate revocation order, Rule 5A:6(a); trial court did not have jurisdiction to consider appellants motion to withdraw his “guilty plea” filed three months after entry of the final revocation order, Rule 1:1(a) 1042224 Brenda Lee Taylor, Administrator of the Estate of Ricky El Taylor, Deceased v. David Posey, et al. Trial court didn’t abuse its discretion when imposing its sentence after considering each mitigating and aggravating components throughout appellants probation revocation hearing 1081224 Dorcon Group, LLC v. Todd J. Westrick, et al.

Judgment affirmed as appellants argument that the trial court erred in accepting his guilty pleas because he didn’t enter them freely and voluntarily is barred by Rule 5A:18 and the ends of justice exception does not apply; no abuse of discretion by the court when it imposed the sentences after weighing mitigating circumstances against appellants conduct 0899221 Darrell K. Saunders, et al. Judgment affirmed as trial courtroom did not err to find adequate proof to convict appellant of driving a automobile beneath the influence of alcohol and while her license was revoked for a prior DUI, Code §§ 18.2-266, 18.2-270, and 46.2-391(D)(2)(a)(ii); any error in admitting the certificate of analysis into proof at trial was harmless 1369223 Robert Dunn Hudson v. Lynsey Alexis Massie, et al. No error in Commissions discovering that appellant did not prove a compensable damage by accident 0117221 Charles S. Friedman, et al. No error in trial courts finding that evidence was enough to support appellants grand larceny conviction where appellant transferred funds to herself outside the scope of and contrary to the duties she owed her mother as her agent pursuant to a energy of legal professional and her mother testified that the transfer of funds was not a reward 0318214 Zaaki Restaurant and Cafe, LLC v. VA Department of Housing and Community Dev., etc., et al.